I had an argument today with my boss about the word "gaijin", because they overuse it in the office. Such as "how many gaijin and how many of us are coming to dinner?"
How about saying "guests", "vendors" (as such was the case), or, god forbid, people??
My boss drives me nuts when he says "Americans get angry easily", or "Japanese people like fish more than meat, but 'mukou no hito' (people from "over there") like meat more than fish"
I get angry (easily) when he says these things, and he says "I just mean in general" and I tell him not to speak "In general".
After reading book after book filled with stereotypes designed to help Americans deal with Japanese businessmen I've decided that stereotypes are useless, even if they're generally true. Stereotypes blind you to other aspects of a persons character, or they blind you all evidence that this particular individual is an exception to the stereotype. They will make you wait for bad behavior. If you read that Japanese people are evasive, you'll find evidence for it sooner or later.
And most importantly, we absolutely loathe someone for fulfilling a stereotype. When we find that obnoxious American or that lazy Mexican or that snotty Frenchmen, we hate him ten times as much as we would a non-steretypical person with the exact same traits. Even as we triumph in how right we were about them and their race, we abhor them and condemn them for it.
I think it's better to be stupid. If you have be surprised everytime you meet a latin man who loves to dance I think that is far better than expecting every one you meet to have the talent.
I told him that, rather than say "that gaijin", he should at least say "that American", or better yet "that tall guy" or "the guy in the red shirt". Of course in Japan saying "that gaijin" probably rules everyone but one out right away, and is the easiest method. And of course he told me that saying "that Gaijin" is just easier and shorter.
I said that yes, of course it is, but in America we've gotten used to making a few sacrifices of efficiency for the sake of courtesy. For example, we rarely say, or we at least say quietly and guiltily, "that black guy over there".
Hiro asked me why that was bad and I really had to think about it for a minute. I just knew that it felt wrong and it felt rude. Now having been "that gaijin" for long enough I think I get it. To point somebody out by race seems to reinforce the attitude that we have looked at someone long enough to determine their skin tone and that is as far as we're going to get. In Japan people look at me long enough to see that I'm a gaijin, and anything else I decide to do is explained by that. I could wear a bright rainbow sweater or skip down the street or whistle in a crowded train, and no one would look at me more than a half second longer- long enough to say "ah, yappari, gaijin".
That's really what I object to, to be labeled as "Gaijin" in such a way that it eclipses all the other things that I am. I am female and I love logic puzzles and I eat sushi and I tell jokes to myself when I'm bored and I hate morning talk shows. Why not call me by my name?
This is usually the point where people tell me that I'm being too sensitive and that no one really means anything by it. Fine. Japan can call people whatever they want and treat Gaijin however they please. However, the fact remains that the women in this country are not having any babies, and sooner or later (in fact, currently) they are going to need people to come and live here and work here. And not just chinese girls to fill the ranks at lawsons or brazilian men to don the parachute pants and go work construction, but thinking people from all over the world to revitalize their tech industry and breathe life into their corporations. If they want to attract the best people here, they will have to start treating them better. Yes, Japan can call us Gaijin and make us feel as alienated and uncomfortable as they want. Hell, they can close their borders and go into sakoku again for all I care- but Japan will be the one to suffer from it. I'm sick of hearing about how Japan is an island nation and they don't have the ability to deal with these kinds of issues. This is a global era; there are no islands anymore.
This is what I told my coworkers, but I wish I didn't have to. Maybe we could be considerate just for the hell of it, not because we don't have enough national resources to support our population. But that's probably too much to ask.
Recent Comments